Jump to content
Molecupedia is a parody encyclopedia written by Molecular Reality Corporation. It is not Wikipedia and is not affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. About

Coulter counter

Page protected
From Molecupedia, the encyclopedia of very small things
Instrument that counts and sizes particles by the electrical resistance they cause in an aperture
Coulter counter
Generated picture of a dim mid-century laboratory bench: a round glass flask of pink liquid with a thin glass rod in it, a tall glass column on a wooden base, and behind them a green oscilloscope screen with a few peaks on a flat line and a cabinet of knobs and amber lamps
A diffusion model's idea of a 1950s Coulter counter. The real Model A used a glass sample tube with a jeweled aperture, a mercury manometer and vacuum-tube electronics.
ClassificationElectrical sensing zone method
AnalytesCells and other particles in an electrolyte, about 0.2 µm to 1,600 µm with standard apertures
InventorWallace H. Coulter, with Joseph R. Coulter Jr.
Year1948 (first demonstration), 1953 (patent), 1956 (Model A)
RelatedCoulter principle
Resistive pulse sensing
Flow cytometry
Hematology analyzer

A Coulter counter is an instrument that counts and sizes particles suspended in an electrolyte by the dip in electric current that each particle causes as it passes through a small aperture. The measurement rests on the Coulter principle, which standards call the electrical sensing zone method and the nanopore literature calls resistive pulse sensing.[1] The first commercial instrument, the Model A, was presented by Wallace H. Coulter in Chicago on October 3, 1956, and counted red blood cells at about 3,300 a second.[2] Coulter Counter has been a registered trademark since 1959 and belongs to Beckman Coulter.[3]

Coulter built it to automate the counting of blood cells, a task that took a technician 15 to 30 minutes per sample, so that the recovery of people exposed to radiation could be followed. His company's Model S of late 1968 produced seven blood parameters from one sample in under a minute, and by 1988 the Coulter companies had built the 80,000th instrument based on the principle.[4][5] The principle still counts cells in some hematology analyzers, which now use optical methods as well, and it counts particles in industry and research.[6]

Accounts of the invention differ, and a 2013 paper by Coulter's former technical adviser set the documents against several of them. The dated notes show a first demonstration on October 16, 1948.[7] Molecular Reality Corporation places its instruments in the same family, calls itself "a small branch on a seventy year old tree", and publishes the opinion that the Coulter brothers "should have won a Nobel prize".[8][9]

Design

A Coulter counter has a sample tube with an aperture in its wall, one electrode inside the tube and one in the beaker around it, a constant current source, a way to draw a measured volume of suspension through the aperture, and electronics that amplify, sort and count the pulses. Everything else in the instrument serves that aperture, which Graham, Coulter's historian, calls "that little bit of nothing in a short bore".[10]

Aperture

The Model A's aperture was the shaft hole of a ring jewel, a disc of synthetic ruby or sapphire of the kind made in Switzerland as bearings for mechanical watches, cemented over a larger hole in a glass tube.[11] Jewels from several suppliers had bores of very uniform diameter, and those without chips at the orifice gave pulses consistent in quality. The hole described in Coulter's 1956 paper was 100 µm wide and 67 µm long, and the Model S later used 100 µm apertures with a length of 0.75 diameters.[2][5] Beckman Coulter's standard apertures now run from 10 µm to 2,000 µm, and one aperture measures particles from 2% to 60% of its diameter.[12]

Metering

A vacuum raises mercury in a reservoir. When the reservoir is opened to the air the mercury returns through a bulb in the glass manometer and touches a start electrode, then a stop electrode, and the suspension drawn through the aperture between those two contacts is the count volume. For the 50 µm and 100 µm apertures it was 500 µL, accurate to 0.25%, and the mercury column that drove it was 0.127 m high, equal to 1.74 m of water.[11] Joseph R. Coulter Jr. said later: "It was the manometer that made the counter work. It was simple, it was easy to control, and it kept working."[11]

Electronics

In the Model A the pulses were amplified for display on an oscilloscope tube, and those above a level set by a threshold control were added up on three decade counters and a mechanical counter. The prototype's electronics unit held 33 vacuum tubes plus the oscilloscope tube.[11][2] A count of about 50,000 cells took about 15 seconds, a rate of about 3,300 cells a second, and a manual count of 500 cells took about 20 minutes. According to Graham, the automated count had one tenth of the error of a count by an expert technologist and took 1.25% of the time.[2][a]

Later models added size bins and automation. The Model B held the aperture current constant and used two interlocked thresholds to count one size bin at a time, and the Model H plotter assembled a 25-bin size distribution from a run of about 100 seconds. An experimental twelve-bin Model C needed 350 vacuum tubes, more power than clinical laboratories usually had.[13] The transistorized Model F projected an image of the aperture on a screen in place of a microscope.[14][5] The Model S of late 1968 diluted the blood, split it between a white-cell bath and a red-cell bath, counted each through three apertures, discarded the aperture whose count disagreed with the other two, and printed seven parameters.[5]

History

Motive

Coulter was born in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1913. In 1939 he went to the Far East as a sales and service engineer for X-ray equipment, and in hospitals there he saw technicians count blood cells by eye on hemocytometers. In Graham's account the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 made the need plain: counts that were rapid and accurate, and repeatable at close intervals for whole populations, to follow the recovery of bone marrow after radiation exposure.[4] A manual count was uncertain by about 16% for red cells and 21% for white cells. In drafts of a proposal for Navy support, Coulter wrote of "an accurate, simple, and rapid means of obtaining red blood cell counts" for use in the event of atomic attack.[7]

Before the principle

The brothers' first approach was optical. In 1934 Andrew Moldavan had proposed counting blood cells photo-electrically as they flowed through a capillary on a microscope stage.[15] After buying a house in Chicago in April 1947, Wallace and Joseph experimented in the basement and found the author's criticisms of the method justified, and by late 1947 a capillary tube cut to its minimum length still gave no counts of single cells.[7]

Around Christmas 1947, according to Graham, Coulter was reconsidering a method he had read about as an electrical engineering student at the Georgia School of Technology, for calculating the resistance of a suspension of particles whose conductivity differs from that of the liquid. Graham cites Maxwell's Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism for it. In July 1948 Coulter obtained a reprint of a short note that used a conductivity cell to show red cells to be poor conductors, and on July 26 he wrote the first statement of the principle: two chambers joined by one small aperture, as short as possible, with an electrode in each.[16]

First demonstrations

Arcs through mica gave apertures of erratic size. On October 16, 1948, Coulter heated the tip of a sharpened needle, burned a hole in a cellophane wrapper from a pack of Joseph's cigarettes, bound the wrapper to a glass tube with rubber bands, and showed that cells in his diluted blood changed an electric current flowing through the hole. "It didn't hold up long," he said later, "but we were able to count some cells."[7][16] Two weeks later he repeated the experiment with a hole 76 µm wide in cellulose acetate film 22 µm thick. The blood was diluted several thousand times in 0.9% sodium chloride, the pulses on the oscilloscope lasted about 1 ms, and a microscope showed the cells crossing as the pulses appeared.[16]

Patent

Patent attorneys to whom Coulter described the idea did not grasp it, and he was told repeatedly, "You can't patent a hole." A former colleague introduced a patent attorney who did understand. An examiner who shared the doubt surmised that a patent might be allowed on sensing particles in a constricted current path if the application included more than an axial current through an aperture, and the application as filed described current paths transverse to the flow, apertures that were not cylinders, and an insulated needle swept through a stationary suspension. It was filed on August 27, 1949, and the patent, US 2,656,508, was granted on October 20, 1953.[16][17]

Coulter sent a proposal to the Office of Naval Research on April 30, 1951. The office's reply of May 16 recorded the work as "To Supply Blood Cell Counter", and partial funding came under contract NONR-1054(00).[7][11] An estimate put the hydrostatic head needed for a few thousand cells a second at about 1.8 m, so the brothers tried motor-driven syringe pumps before settling on vacuum and the manometer.[11] A prototype Model A went to the Navy office near the end of 1953.[11] The first production counters were assembled in the basement of a Chicago apartment building on North Kenmore Avenue, in an unfinished area by the furnace, by the company's first employee, a technician who, Wallace recalled, built them faster than he could sell them and lent him his car for sales calls.[2]

Coulter Electronics

About 20 Model A counters had been placed by June 1957. Coulter Electronics, Inc., was incorporated on April 14, 1958, with Joseph as president; more than 1,500 counters had been placed by February 1961, and the company moved to Hialeah, Florida, in December 1961.[2][18] The Model S followed in late 1968, and an advertisement five months after its first one claimed 1,000 installations in two years. It did not separate white cells into types or count platelets.[5]

Beckman Instruments acquired Coulter Corporation in 1997, creating Beckman Coulter, and Danaher acquired Beckman Coulter in 2011.[19] Joseph died on November 27, 1995, and Wallace on August 7, 1998.[20]

As usually told

Retellings of the origin vary. Versions in circulation before 2013 had Coulter joining the Navy in the Second World War and building a plankton counter, or working on Navy paint and counting pigment particles, and a version told from the podium at a cytometry meeting in 2013 had a sample of paint freeze, after which Coulter turned to blood because blood and paint are similar in viscosity.[7] Graham, who wrote as an employee of Beckman Coulter, answered that Coulter neither joined the Navy nor worked for it as a civilian, that he documented the principle in July 1948 and demonstrated it in October with "blood greatly diluted", and that a Navy ship paint of the 1940s had a viscosity of about 550 mPa·s against about 5 mPa·s for blood, a ratio of 110 to 1. The Navy enters the record in 1951, as a source of funds.[7]

Molecular Reality's introduction to Epic Quest Bio puts the first test in a Chicago basement in 1948, uses a needle hole in the cellophane from a pack of cigarettes, and gives the motive as radiation sickness after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, all of which Graham documents. Its author adds that almost all the instruments that perform the complete blood count "are still, essentially, Coulter Counters".[21][dubious · discuss]

Applications

Blood

Before automation a complete blood count meant a technician, a hemocytometer, a microscope and 15 to 30 minutes. The Model S made the red cell count, white cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit and three red cell indices a routine printout, and Graham counted at least 6,500 DxH 800 analyzers installed by 2018, each able to run 100 samples an hour through Coulter apertures.[5][4] Automated analyzers measure cells by electrical impedance, by optical analysis, or by both. Instruments of the 1980s such as Coulter's VCS transducers added a second, high-frequency measurement that responds to the interior of a cell.[6]

Industry and research

Beckman Coulter lists microorganisms, cell types, pharmaceuticals, colorants, foods, abrasives, explosives, minerals and metals among the materials measured with the principle, and it gives upper size limits that depend on the material, about 500 µm for sand and about 75 µm for tungsten carbide.[12]

Cell sorting

In 1965 M. J. Fulwyler described a device that measured cell volume in a Coulter aperture, enclosed each cell in a droplet charged according to the volume sensed, and deflected the droplet in an electrostatic field into a collection vessel. It separated mixtures of mouse and human red cells, and hamster ovary cells that passed through it kept growing at their normal rate.[22]

Molecules

In 1970 DeBlois and Bean counted polystyrene spheres 90 nm across with single submicron pores etched in plastic sheet.[23] In 1994 a paper on counting polymers in a single ion channel opened with a description of the Coulter counter, and in 1996 single strands of DNA were driven through a protein pore.[24][25]

Lineage

The instrument drew on sources that had nothing to do with blood: Moldavan's photo-electric method of 1934, Maxwell's treatment of the conductivity of a medium holding suspended spheres, and a ballistics instrument. Joseph found in library stacks a paper by a Belgian artilleryman on timing cannon projectiles by letting mercury flow through a small aperture, started and stopped by two electromagnets, and Wallace adapted it by sealing start and stop electrodes through the wall of a manometer. Graham's source is an 1873 translation of P. Le Boulengé's The Electric Clepsydra.[11] The apertures came from watchmakers. The first pinhole apertures in glass were made by a University of Chicago glassworker who had been assigned to the Manhattan Project.[16]

Molecular Reality describes its own place in the line in the same terms. Its guide says that the idea of pore based sensing "is older than you might think, and its family tree is noble", and that "Coulter counted cells, the biophysicists threaded DNA, and we are trying to give the whole family mechanical control." It continues: "We are not the first, and we are not pretending to be. We are a small branch on a seventy year old tree, and the tree is wonderful."[8]

In 1948 Coulter's diluted blood crossed a hole burned in cellophane. In late 2018 a pore of the company's own received blood for the first time. According to the founder's post, this was "the first time we tried putting blood through one of our demonpores", with most of the team in the room, and he wrote: "Completely on a whim as we were shutting down for the day, I felt that I should prove a point, and I grabbed a razor blade and bled into the flow cell." The next day the same arrangement had become a microparticle turnstile.[26] The episode is told in Rain of blood (demonpore).

Honors

Coulter, who never finished his engineering degree, was granted 85 US patents and wrote one technical paper, the 1956 account of the Model A, which was chosen in 2000 as one of the 86 most influential hematology papers of the twentieth century. He received the John Scott Medal in 1960 and the IEEE Morris E. Leeds Award in 1980, was memorialized by the National Academy of Engineering in 2001, and was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame in 2004.[10]

A post on Molecular Reality's member site, written in the voice of the persona Thucydides, opens with the words "They should have won a Nobel prize" and goes on to say that Wallace and Joseph Coulter "developed the technology behind the world's most common liquid diagnostic tests, the Complete Blood Count".[9] In the founder's introduction to Epic Quest Bio he calls it "strange" that Coulter "did not win a Nobel Prize for Medicine".[21] The post ends by asking which member will be the first to get a personal complete blood count on an MR device, and the company's guide states that "nothing on the stream is a medical claim".[9][8]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Calculated from the 500 µL count volume, the count time of about 15 s and the cross-section of the 100 µm aperture: the mean speed of the liquid in the aperture was about 4 m/s and a cell took about 16 µs to cross its 67 µm length. A speed of 4 m/s is consistent with the 1.74 m of water head of the manometer.

References

  1. ^ "ISO 13319:2007, Determination of particle size distributions: Electrical sensing zone method". International Organization for Standardization. 2007. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  2. ^ a b c d e f M. D. Graham (November 18, 2020). "The Coulter Principle: For the Good of Humankind, chapter 5, "Promotion"". University of Kentucky. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  3. ^ "COULTER COUNTER, US trademark registration 0679591". Justia Trademarks. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  4. ^ a b c M. D. Graham (November 18, 2020). "The Coulter Principle: For the Good of Humankind, chapter 1, "Inspiration"". University of Kentucky. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  5. ^ a b c d e f M. D. Graham (November 18, 2020). "The Coulter Principle: For the Good of Humankind, chapter 8, "Elaboration"". University of Kentucky. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  6. ^ a b Daves, M.; et al. (2024). "Modern hematology analyzers: beyond the simple blood cells count (with focus on the red blood cells)". Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine 9: 4. doi:10.21037/jlpm-23-32.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Graham, M. D. (2013). "The Coulter principle: Imaginary origins". Cytometry Part A 83 (12): 1057-1061. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.22398. PMID 24151220.
  8. ^ a b c "Keltar's Field Guide to Molecular Reality". Molecular Reality Corporation. August 2026.
  9. ^ a b c Thucydides (March 29, 2026). "Bend it like Beckman Coulter". EQBio-OS.
  10. ^ a b M. D. Graham (November 18, 2020). "The Coulter Principle: For the Good of Humankind, chapter 9, "Contemplation"". University of Kentucky. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h M. D. Graham (November 18, 2020). "The Coulter Principle: For the Good of Humankind, chapter 4, "Implementation"". University of Kentucky. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  12. ^ a b "Coulter Principle Short Course, Chapter 2". Beckman Coulter. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  13. ^ M. D. Graham (November 18, 2020). "The Coulter Principle: For the Good of Humankind, chapter 6, "Commercialization"". University of Kentucky. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  14. ^ M. D. Graham (January 9, 2024). "The Coulter Principle: Early Implementations". The Blood Project. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  15. ^ Moldavan, A. (1934). "Photo-electric technique for the counting of microscopical cells". Science 80: 188-189. PMID 17817054.
  16. ^ a b c d e M. D. Graham (November 18, 2020). "The Coulter Principle: For the Good of Humankind, chapter 3, "Invention"". University of Kentucky. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  17. ^ W. H. Coulter (October 20, 1953). "US2656508A: Means for counting particles suspended in a fluid". Google Patents. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  18. ^ M. D. Graham (November 18, 2020). "The Coulter Principle: For the Good of Humankind, chapter 7, "Transition"". University of Kentucky. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  19. ^ "Our history". Beckman Coulter. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  20. ^ M. D. Graham (November 18, 2020). "The Coulter Principle: For the Good of Humankind, front matter". University of Kentucky. Retrieved October 25, 2026.
  21. ^ a b Kemmishtree (March 2026). "Epic Quest Bio". Molecular Reality Corporation.
  22. ^ Fulwyler, M. J. (1965). "Electronic separation of biological cells by volume". Science 150 (3698): 910-911. doi:10.1126/science.150.3698.910.
  23. ^ DeBlois, R. W.; Bean, C. P. (1970). "Counting and sizing of submicron particles by the resistive pulse technique". Review of Scientific Instruments 41 (7): 909-916. doi:10.1063/1.1684724.
  24. ^ Bezrukov, S. M.; Vodyanoy, I.; Parsegian, V. A. (1994). "Counting polymers moving through a single ion channel". Nature 370 (6487): 279-281. doi:10.1038/370279a0. PMID 7518571.
  25. ^ Kasianowicz, J. J.; Brandin, E.; Branton, D.; Deamer, D. W. (1996). "Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 (24): 13770-13773. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13770.
  26. ^ Kemmishtree (March 29, 2026). "rain of blood". EQBio-OS.

Further reading

Last edited 4 hours ago by Translocation event